![]() (for some clips, 30 seconds compared to some renders taking over 10 minutes). The render is very much faster, by a factor of several times.There can still be some stutter with some FX, color correction, and lens distort correction applied, but not nearly as bad as before. I received Resolve Studio today and put it to the test on both a desktop and laptop (the latter having an even better video adapter than the former). I have not regretted getting the studio version, the speed and extra features like de-haze, de-noise and fast distortion correction are great. The GPU-accelerated distortion correction filter in studio (verses using the extremely, painfully slow fusion workaround in the free version), is instant, so studio will definitely help you there. The studio version has a nice de-noise capability, but if I use too high a quality setting, or use it when I have several other color-correction nodes already for a clip (I like to keep each type of correction in its own node to make it easier to tweak), I sometimes hit the GPU memory full error and the video cannot be rendered, requiring a little re-ordering to make things work (doing the de-noise in the first node seems to help a lot). However, you might run into issues with the GPU memory getting full with only a 4GB card and certain effects. The studio version will certainly be faster and smoother, because it uses GPU hardware acceleration for many things (not just encode/decode) and the free one doesn't use GPU acceleration for anything. My question is simply if the free version makes use of that, or if I should need the Studio version for it. PNY Quadro P1000 video card 4GB, single GPU (NVIDIA Pascal architecture)īONUS: if you go to this NVIDIA developer SDK page, and scroll down to the table under the heading " NVENC - Hardware-Accelerated Video Encoding", you should see which level architecture has 10-bit H.265 processing baked in (mine is Pascal).SSDs: M.2 NVMe PCIe, boot and editing drives.I've seen differences of opinion of whether the free version does hardware encoding or software emulation - it's not clear to me if I really need the studio version to get faster processing. ![]() Question: will the paid-for Studio version give me better performance for this than the free, all other things being equal? I can only imagine that getting deeper into FX would only exasperate the problem. After adding LUTs and doing lens distortion correction, it's now getting very choppy / stuttery. Premise: I've been using the free version since I got my M2P and it's worked okay, as long as I stayed with simple clip editing and splicing.īut lately I've been shooting in HVEC/H.265 D-log. For a comparison of all features, go to the Blackmagicdesign web site. ![]() First, note that this is not a thread for discussing all of the differences between DaVinci Resolve free vs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |